Friday, October 4, 2013

Alexander J. Masters on the I SPY SOMETHING series


Tell us a little bit about your background. How did you get started in narrating/producing audio books? How many audio books have you narrated?

 
 
I was active in theater when I was very young and was performing on stage until I was about 18, at which point I became more interested in the written word and its potential for being the most raw and concept-based artistic expression. As a result, I received my degree in literature with the intent to write fiction. While at university, I met my now wife, who is Croatian, and upon graduating, moved to Zagreb to live with her. Now, Croatia has about a 30% domestic unemployment rate, so the odds of finding work as a foreigner are not favorable. This led me to start looking into online freelancing opportunities. I began picking up jobs as an editor and applied to a few voice-acting gigs because of my earlier interest in theater. After a time, I discovered that not only was I getting more jobs as a voice-actor, but the pay was significantly higher. I started with advertisements and English learning programs, and even voiced a few video game characters, but because of my love for literature, I was mostly looking for work with more narrative substance. At this point, I’ve been working in the field for about two years and have produced eight audiobooks.

 

How much acting is involved in narrating a story?


 Quite a lot, actually. I think listeners can always tell the difference between a narrator who is performing a cold read (has never seen or read over the text before the recording) and a narrator who has read the text at least once, analyzed and developed the characters, and rehearsed the lines thoroughly before entering the recording process. Characterization is particularly important when the story is told through a first-person perspective, as with The I Spy Stories, because the narrative is driven almost solely though the thoughts and opinions of the protagonist, so if the narrator does not fully understand—and to some extent identify with the motivations, desires, and flaws of protagonist, the result can be unnatural, which, considering the narrator’s job is to breathe life into the characters s/he portrays, could potentially compromise the believability of the story as a whole.

 You narrated all three of the I Spy stories. Mark is probably one of my most cold-blooded and ruthless characters. You did a wonderful job of humanizing him. What feelings or emotions were you focused on conveying with your voice? Did you consciously change his voice as the stories progressed?


 

First of all, thank you very much! Mark is a fascinating character: I’m not sure I would go so far as to say that I would consider him cold-blood necessarily, but it is certainly one of the facades that he has come to assume as a result of his profession’s perspective on the expendability of human life. He is incredibly disillusioned because of this perspective, though in many ways has a greater understanding of people’s motivations. This level of experience in the human condition leads him to be constantly disappointed when his expectations of people do not match the reality. On the other hand, he is quite often correct in his assessments of people, which over time has given him a bit of a superiority complex.

 
As the narrative opens, Mark is essentially a broken man: isolated and alone, exhausted and both mentally and physically wounded from his last mission. The last time he had any warmth or joy in his life was when he was with Steven, who, he rightly assumes, has moved on. He has to physically remove himself from the situation that is causing him to act cold-bloodedly before he can regain his humanity, which means turning back to that point at which his warmth and joy was derived, Steven. He does so only to find that, on the surface, Steven no longer wants to fulfill this role for him, though even so, Mark’s hopefulness does not altogether falter.

 
As the love between them begins to spark back up again, we see Mark coming out of his damaged state and gradually he becomes more and more alive. At this point, we realize that Mark is not ruthless at all, but rather a consummate romantic and optimist who had lost his love and thus, his human side. As he begins to put himself back together with the aid of Steven, he becomes more confident and realized. My goal with Mark was to covey this transition from broken and despondent to fulfilled and content.

 

What character was the most fun to narrate? Why?


 
Mark, no contest. His observations and comments are priceless and filled with wit and poignancy. He is the most complicated and flawed character in the stories, and because of this, the most fun to narrate.

 

Which character was the most difficult to narrate? Why?


 
It’s a toss-up between Anoushesh and Lena. To begin with, I’m never truly satisfied with my portrayal of female characters, and add to that cultural distinctions and foreign accents, and the product is about ten different takes on every line they say until the result is something that I can live with.

 

Was there a particular scene you think you read especially well? Or that you particularly enjoyed reading?


 
My favorite parts were when Mark was either getting in someone’s face or responding to someone’s stupidity. The party scene from I Spy Something Christmas was the most fun because I really got to play with the characters of the guests until I got them stereotyped and boring enough for the purposes of the story. I think my favorite line was when an old codger at the party says to Mark, “So Steven tells us you used to be a civil servant…in my day, that was code for spook,” and Mark responds without missing a beat, “Really? In my day it was code for civil servant.” Brilliant.

 

Readers have remarked on how beautifully you read the moments of intimacy between the characters. How awkward is it to read erotic scenes aloud?


 
Now, bearing in mind that when I’m reading these erotic scenes, I’m sitting alone in a small, dimly lit, padded room, essentially having sex with myself, it’s actually not as awkward as one might think. You do your best to set the mood for yourself—maybe light a few candles and have a glass of wine, and then you just get right into it. All of these things considered (or not, if you don’t want that spectacular mental image), the only thing that’s actually difficult or slightly awkward is the amount of takes and re-takes it requires to get a realistic and natural-sounding moan.

 

What’s the most satisfying or rewarding part of narrating/producing an audio book?


 
As trite as it may sound, the most satisfying part is when the project is drawing to a close and all of the various parts are coming into a sort of cohesion. As far as rewarding, it’s really a great feeling to look at the number of sales on a project and see the ratings and reviews left by people who enjoyed it.

 

Do you ever find yourself wishing the author hadn’t taken the story in a particular direction? Or is narrating a much more detached process?


 
While it can be difficult to stay detached when you are invested in a story for a greater amount of time, I do try not to impugn the judgment of the author. That being said, it’s only natural as a reader to imagine alternate directions that the author could have taken, but I don’t think I ever explicitly ‘wish’ they had taken the story in a different direction.

 

Where can readers/listeners find out more about you and your work?


 
As of now, my resume is still fairly short and I’ve not done much as far as self-promotion. A few of my other projects can be found on Audible, though for the most part, my work is featured on my clients’ individual websites. I do, however, have a working profile and portfolio with some of my other projects here: https://www.odesk.com/users/~01876d163e747c9671

26 comments:

  1. Hi Josh and Alexander,

    Thank you, Josh, for another spectacular narrator interview. They always bring another level to your audio books. And Alexander's responses are wonderful.

    I have listened to ISSB and Alexander is so right in every way for this series. I can't wait for hear the other two stories. I have commented to you on many occasions of my love for Mark's character, and Alexander's portrayal is everything I had hoped it would be.

    Thank you again, Josh, for writing all these magnificent words. And thank you, Alexander, for doing them such beautiful justice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These guys read these scenes so beautifully. And I was relaxed when I wrote them. So I don't know why it is such AGONY to hear them read aloud. :-D

      Delete
    2. Alexander did a terrific job. He really brings a sensibility and intelligence to his reading.

      Delete
  2. Thank you Josh and Alexander for this great interview!!!

    Alexander's analysis of Mark's character is absolutely fascinating, and it's so interesting to learn about how the narration is approached. As a reader who loves these books so very much, it makes me happy to know that the narrator took the time to read the story and understand the characters, and it really comes through in the narration, which is exactly right for Mark's voice, imho, so thank you for that :-)

    And while still pondering all that, i found myself laughing with the answer for the erotic-scenes question! So funny!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oops I responded about the erotic scenes above by accident, but yes. :-D

      I love that Alexander really thought about the characters, really had a grasp on who they were and what they wanted. That comes through from the first few words.

      Delete
  3. Thanks for this interview. I've just finished listening to the three stories and I have to say I loved Alexander's interpretation of Mark (I really laughed at his delivery of Mark's more menacing humour!) and he also brought Steven to life which I really appreciated as I am in love with him! Great stories, wonderfully realised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree. I think they are both rather tricky characters. Mark, because it would be easy to go over the top with him. And Stephen because it would be easy to make him flat and dull.

      Delete
  4. So very happy that you conduct these narrator interviews Josh!

    Alexander - your interpretation of Mark and Stephen is sublime. I absolutely delight in these beloved characters coming to life in my ears. Your understanding of Mark's personality really shines through. The tone you use when Stephen says "Maaark" in that exasperated, surrendering, loving tone all the time, really makes me smile.

    As always, I love the insights and inside scoop regarding the narrating process as well. Thanks guys!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Dianne. It's been very interesting doing these interviews. All my narrators have been such sharp, creative guys.

      Delete
    2. I love that "Maaaark" too. :-D It does perfectly capture the exasperated tenderness.

      Delete
  5. Hi, Josh and Alexander. Wonderful interview. I have really enjoyed all the audio books you have produced so far (some more than others), but this one felt particularly nuanced. I thought Alexander really did a fantastic job with all the characters - I keep re-listening because I have picked up a couple different things that I missed reading the book.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice to read this as I'm currently listening to In From the Cold--it's the first of your audiobooks I have tried. I do like the way Alexander narrates; he really captures Mark's exhaustion and emotional distance at the beginning. Haven't made it to the realistic moan yet. Something to look forward to. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thank you, Josh and Alexander, for a fascinating interview. I really enjoyed the insight into making the characters "sing" (or moan, as the case may be) and how the process develops. I think Alexander is far too hard on himself about the accents because I think he's done a brilliant job! I was actually thinking about that as I listened on my way home from work because the Old Man and his Irish accent were added, and handled brilliantly! Wonderful choice, Josh, for a wonderful story.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm very happy with the final results. I certainly recommend Alexander to anyone looking for a narrator.

      Delete
  8. The preparation Alexander did and the thought which he gave to the books really paid off in an excellent audiobook which I feel is true to the characters as written by you, Josh. I thoroughly enjoyed the audiobook(s). Many thanks to you both!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much, Helena. I really am enjoying the audio book process. Even more than I originally imagined. And it's such a kick that so many readers are enjoying the audio journey as well.

      Delete
  9. Thank you so much for this great interview, both of you. I was listening to I Spy Something Bloody while planting tulips today and couldn't have enjoyed the book more. I love Alexander's Mark, but also his Stephen, Bryce and Old Man.

    I've always loved Mark and Stephen's story, but I think Alexander's narration adds some delicious spice to it. For example the scene in chapter 3 where Mark meets Bryce the first time — I thought Alexander did a wonderful job with it. The frightfully unsuspecting behavior and tone of Bryce, the predatory, ominous calculation of Mark and Stephen's painful awareness of them both.

    Anyway, I don't even know how many times I've read I Spy Something Bloody (it was the second Josh Lanyon book I ever read), but I never grow tired of it. I love the dynamics between these men and I love them also individually (even Mark *grin*). Thank you so much for the lovely audio version!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes! I love that scene. I always thought that was a very funny scene, but I think Alexander brought the edged humor to the fore.

      Delete
  10. I loved revisiting these stories as audio books.
    Being an Australian, narration always adds more dimension to the imagined character, with the additions of the accents.
    It was pure pleasure listening to Mark telling his story, but I think my favorite character was Steven. He quiet and solid nature, the way he supported Mark even though for him he thinks it's over. Then as he comes to the finally conclusion, that Mark is it for him, no matter what.
    Thank you Josh and thank you Alexander.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm so glad. I'm really happy with the way this project turned out. So happy that readers are enjoying it too.

      Delete
  11. Love these interviews so interesting to hear their take on the story and characters. They don't give themselves enough credit:-)

    Johanna O phrased it so eloquently -- the Mark and Bryce exchange in all three stories "priceless".

    J, I was also surprised to hear you refer to Mark as "cold blooded" ...I think he is good at what he does and basically executes for a purpose and as Lisa in AE pointed out there is difference between - Killing, yes. Murder, no....Mark has just been killing I hope. Besides Stephen wouldn't, couldn't love someone who was cold-blooded - he is to decent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've enjoyed every one of these interviews!

      You know, that's a good point. I think Mark thinks of himself as cold-blooded, but in fact, you're right. He's not a murderer. The fact that he judges his own acts so harshly probably speaks to his better nature. ;-)

      Delete
  12. I am currently listening to the first book, having read all of them previously and Alexander is just so good.

    As an Australian with British parents. I have found in some audio books the narrator's version of a British accent so jarring, I've have been unable finish listening to the book.

    Stephen and Mark sound just as I imagine them and I know this is going to end up one of my favourite audio books.

    Great writing, wonderful narration. What more could I ask for.

    Theresa

    ReplyDelete
  13. Wonderful! That certainly makes me happy.

    ReplyDelete